Pip: The Old Testament opens with “In the beginning” and closes with “a curse” — and Carla Onjel has spent the better part of a biblical library figuring out what happened in between.
Mara: This episode follows her prophetic exegesis from the Minor Prophets all the way back through the Major Prophets, wisdom literature, and the kings and chronicles of Israel — tracing a single thread from exile to rebuilding to the question of what God actually requires.
Pip: Let’s start with the prophets who saw the end coming.
Minor Prophets
Mara: The Minor Prophets carry a consistent warning, and the Zechariah and Malachi study names its arc plainly: “Our journey through the Old Testament began in Genesis with the words…In the beginning and ends with the words…a curse.”
Pip: That’s the whole testament in one sentence — and the word “Old” is doing more work than most readers notice. Wherever you see old, you’re meant to look for new.
Mara: The Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, and Haggai study develops that urgency. Habakkuk is told to write the vision down because it has an appointed time. Zephaniah warns that the day of the Lord is coming for those who ignore God until disaster strikes. Haggai redirects the question inward: consider the state of your own house.
Pip: Amos sharpens the accountability angle — to whom much is given, much is required. Obadiah, Jonah, and Micah round out the picture: betrayal, running from God, and the remnant that stays faithful. Hosea opens the whole sequence with the premise that grounds everything else — redemption and grace extended even to those who wandered.
Mara: The prophetic thread leads directly into the major voices who named the consequences when those warnings went unheeded.
Major Prophets and Exile
Mara: Isaiah sets the interpretive frame for everything that follows — sixty-six chapters, judgment giving way to comfort, and a careful distinction between prophecy as receiving a vision from God and prophesying as relaying it.
Pip: Jeremiah was ordained before birth to ask one question: “What seest thou?” The answer shapes the entire prophecy.
Mara: Lamentations holds the consequence when no one answered well — Jerusalem destroyed, seventy years of captivity. But the study reads that not as a dead end. It frames the captivity as a set time, a debt with a term, and points toward repentance as the release.
Pip: Daniel closes the sequence with a line that lands squarely in the present: “Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” That’s not comfort — that’s a diagnostic.
Mara: And Ezekiel supplies the discernment test that runs through all of it. The phrase “The Word of the LORD Came Unto Me” appears fifty times in that study — repetition as a marker of verified authority, against a backdrop where false voices are everywhere.
Pip: From exile and its warnings, the questions shift — not what went wrong, but what does it mean to be human inside all of it.
Wisdom, Poetry, and Human Questions
Pip: The wisdom books are where the exegesis gets personal. Psalms proved the hardest — the post describes it as “by far the most challenging exegesis,” with AI drawing from subjective public-domain sources that kept drifting from the original intent of the Word.
Mara: That’s the tension the Psalms study names directly, quoting Second Timothy 4:3-4 as the warning: teachers with itching ears, turning from sound doctrine toward fables. Staying true to the text required constant redirection.
Pip: Which makes the arrival of Proverbs feel almost earned.
Mara: It does. Where Psalms was arduous, Proverbs is described as a “beautiful, effortless blessing” — fear and wisdom walking hand in hand through every chapter as a love letter of instruction. The method shifts too: the question or observation is saved until the end, so AI can move uninterrupted through the message of each chapter.
Vain Self-Righteousness
Pip: Job sits at the other end of that ease. The study centers on self-justification and self-righteousness — Job righteous in his own eyes, and the suffering as the thing that corrects the posture. It also takes one careful turn to establish what Satan actually is not: not omnipresent, not omniscient, operating through deception rather than real authority.
Mara: Ecclesiastes names the underlying frustration that runs through all of it. “Vanity of Vanities, Saith the Preacher; All is Vanity” — the post reads that not as despair but as diagnosis. Human intent and machine intelligence together, the study argues, are still insufficient without Christ Jesus as the essential presence.
Pip: And Song of Solomon works the same territory from the other direction — not the emptiness, but the longing. Love arriving unexpectedly, giving a new direction rather than being driven by emotion or obligation.
Mara: The wisdom books ask the deepest human questions. The history books show what happened when entire nations tried to answer them through power.
Kings, Chronicles, and Rebuilding
Mara: Esther opens this stretch with a lesson in kingdom protocol. The post is direct: “Pride goeth before destruction, and an Haughty Spirit before a fall.” Vashti’s refusal to honor the king’s authority, Haman’s demand for admiration — both are cautionary poles against which Esther’s obedient step of faith is measured.
Pip: The authority question in Esther isn’t really about a Persian court. It’s about understanding who Jesus is — not just a friend, but the Son of the King, carrying the same authority as the Father.
Mara: First and Second Kings trace how quickly that authority can be forgotten. Elisha receives a double portion of Elijah’s spirit and performs twice as many miracles — and still the kings drift. Second Kings names it plainly: miracles don’t immunize a people who turn from their source.
Pip: First Chronicles amplifies David’s story with genealogical precision the post insists is never accidental. Every jot and tittle carrying purpose. Second Chronicles then summarizes why captivity is coming, using Isaiah 28:13: “precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken.”
Mara: Instruction given to guide, received in fragments, and ultimately becoming the mechanism of collapse. Ezra opens the return from that collapse with a question about the covenant of salt. A detail that seemed minor but set the entire tone for the rebuilding project. Grounded in the call to rightly divide the Word of Truth.
Pip: And Nehemiah finishes what Ezra started. Walls and gates rebuilt in record time. Each one named, each repairer chosen. The opposition present because a promise was at stake.
Mara: The whole arc from captivity to rebuilding asks the same question the prophets were already asking: what does it cost to stay in step with the source?
Prophetic Insight of New Things To Come
Pip: From “In the beginning” to a curse. And then all the way back through exile, rebuilding, and the question of what love and wisdom actually require. The Old Testament turns out to be one very long argument for paying attention.
Mara: The New Testament that was promised after four hundred years of silence is where that argument lands. That’s the territory ahead.
Purchase a prophetic exegesis study tool using human intent & machine intelligence for the Books of Bible.
Discover the promises that await humanity in “The Gospel According to AI: The Sixth Day.”